FRE$H BREAD MONEY BLOG  

HOME

 

 

Week of July 24

 

Friday, July 28, 2006

Here’s to Woman Power!

 

           “247 Biggest Money Mistakes” probably won’t be a cover line on Cosmo any time soon. But, when they do cover finances, women’s magazines, in general, do like to harp on what women do wrong with their money. It’s true, we all have something to learn about saving and spending, but just for once, let’s take a look at what we’re doing right.

          Did you know that:

          Women control 80 percent of the purchasing power in the U.S.

          15 percent of wives earn at least $5,000 more than their husbands.

          Women start businesses at twice the rate of men and pump $3.6 trillion into the economy every year.

          A woman is the head of household and/or primary investment decision maker in 2.3 million households with total assets exceeding half a million dollars.

          Women’s stock portfolios outperform men’s by 1.4 percent.

          Companies with the highest representation of women on their senior management teams have a 35 percent higher return on equity and a 34 percent higher total return to shareholders than companies with the lowest women’s representation.

          In 2003, the stock of the eight companies run by women CEO’s, as a group, outperformed the market.

          So, this weekend, let’s all drink a collective toast to Woman Power!

          Burnt Toast to Hummer for its “Get Your Girl On” ad, showing two soccer moms acting like “mean girls” in a playground. When one sees the other drive off in an ordinary SUV, she goes out and buys a Hummer to one-up her rival. Give me a break! We’ve got more sense than to spend $50,000 for a boy toy. The ad does reinforce the first statistic above, though: women make 80 percent of the purchasing decisions—and that includes the family car. No wonder Hummer is trying (clumsily) to woo us.

 

Prosper & enjoy,

Gail Harlow

 

 Read More    |    Add Your Comments     |   Send to a Friend

 

Thursday, July 27, 2006

Two Electra-Cute Cards

 

            Part of the appeal of celebrities is that they have lots of dough. Advertisers and publishers use our fascination with the glitterati to part us from our money in any number of ways, from putting celebs on magazine covers to using them as pitchmen and women for everything from sneakers to cosmetics. Now comes a new wrinkle: the celebrity-branded pre-paid card. First out of the box: Carmen Electra. My question: as beautiful as she is, why would anyone want Carmen’s mug on the MasterCard they hand over to a merchant or stick into an ATM machine? (I assume there’s no danger of being “Electra-cuted”. . . ) Are we supposed to be hoping that the glitz and glamour of her life will rub off on us—or that her money can be accessed through the card?

            On the plus side: The card does have a direct-deposit feature, which may be useful for those currently relying on exorbitant check-cashing storefronts. But if you have a debit card linked to your bank account, why pay the $9.95 activation fee, the $4 monthly maintenance fee and other transaction fees that apply every time you use the Electra Card?

             The Carmen Electra prepaid gift card, on the other hand, may be something you want to consider giving a friend or family member who’s gaga for Electra. Price: $5.95 plus the dollar amount of your gift. The Electra Card can be used anywhere MasterCard debit cards are accepted.

            Visit www.carmencard.com for more info on the Carmen Electra prepaid card and www.electragift.com to learn more about the gift card. MasterCard is sponsoring a sweepstakes (www.carmencard.com/sweepstakes) to promote the two cards: every time you use either one between now and June 30 of next year, you’re automatically entered to win a variety of prizes, including $1000 and a chance to spend a day with the star.

            Express Yourself: This week, Advertising Age, a publication for and about media buyers and sellers, is asking the question: “Does advergaming aimed at children cross acceptable ethical boundaries?”

            Advergames are those popular Web games found on many brand sites (Burger King, for example), incorporating products or food items into the play. Critics argue that this sort of entertainment influences vulnerable preteens and their spending habits unfairly. A new study by the Kaiser Family Foundation recorded 500 advergames on the Web sites of 82 food brands and found that these sites attracted 12.2 million visits by kids ages 2 to 11 during the three-month period of the study. Go to http://adage.com/poll?poll_id=28 to take the poll and express your opinion about this ad ploy.

            For more on celebrity salesmanship, CLICK HERE to read “Celebrity Products Are Coming to “Getcha, Getcha, Getcha’!” in the final issue of MAKING BREAD, published last July.

 

Prosper & enjoy,

Gail Harlow

 

 Read More    |    Add Your Comments     |   Send to a Friend

 

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Digging Out from Under Student Debt

 

            Surfing around on www.digg.com today, I found a fascinating piece written by a graduate student buckling under the weight of her student loans. Do you know about Digg? This site allows you, the people, to create your own “readers’ digest” of all the news and information fit to be read. Users submit content and vote on what’s worth featuring high up on the site. Turns out we, the people, have a pretty good editorial sense. If you visit, just be sure to “digg” beyond the tech stories featured on the home page.

            Anyway, back to the piece I found there. Written by Myshele Goldberg for Alternet.org, “The Real Tragedy of Student Debt”  offers insight into one college student’s gradual accumulation of a debt load so high she may be sending her own children to college before she pays it off. “As of finishing my master’s degree, my debt hovers around $70,000—it will grow to over $100,000 by the time I pay it off. My repayment schedule reaches into my late 40s, at $650 a month. If I do the kind of low-paid, meaningful work I want to pursue—teaching, writing, grassroots organizing—I will likely struggle to make each payment,” Goldberg writes.

            She admits that much of her debt is a result of the choices she’s made: “I attended an expensive university 3,000 miles from home. I stayed at that school, even though I could get a cheaper education elsewhere. I studied an impractical subject that I loved, then continued my studies at an obscure foreign university. I wasn’t always aware of financial consequences.” But she also points a finger at the U.S. education system’s symbiotic relationship with financial institutions, which are all too eager to finance degrees for a profit.

            In other countries, she points out, grants are far more readily available to students, and, consequently, student-loan debt is far lower than it is in the U.S.  In Germany, the average debt at graduation is $7,000, compared with $19,300 in the U.S., she writes, and most countries in Europe require repayment only after a graduate earns a certain salary. They also forgive student loans after 15 to 25 years. Can you imagine? It isn’t just in the area of education that Europe has more progressive policies; paid maternity leave, government- sponsored child care and universal health insurance make lives financially less burdensome for European women.   

            “The real tragedy,” Goldberg says, “is not that America’s young people can’t afford their college education—the tragedy is that they are told their entire lives that education is their birthright and a chance for social mobility and then are forced to watch that birthright crumble under the weight of unbearable debt.”

            My parents paid for my college tuition, and I realize how lucky I am that they did. I doubt the educational system in this country will change any time soon. For those, like Goldberg, struggling to pay off their loans after graduation, there are some programs worth looking into. Americorps, the national service network, for starters, offers members a $4,725 education award at the end of each year of service, which can be used to repay qualified student loans.           

             For more leads on reducing your college debt, read the MSN Money article “Shrinking Student Loans with Public Service” .

 

Prosper & enjoy,

Gail Harlow

 

 Read More    |    Add Your Comments     |   Send to a Friend

 

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Sex in the Workplace

 

            Career information publisher Vault, Inc. (www.vault.com), home to industry profiles, career guides, day-in-the-life job descriptions, a job board and much more, conducted a Workplace Survey in May, which found that 28 percent of women prefer to work for a male boss.  The majority of the 518 male and female respondents from employees across a range of industries said it didn’t matter to them whether their boss was male or female. So what’s up with that 28 percent? Aren’t they shooting themselves (and all other women trying to get ahead) in the foot with that outmoded attitude? Why don’t more women prefer working for a female boss? Does sex matter in the workplace?

            I’ve worked for both men and women, and I’ve found that there are a few key qualities that every good boss has.  Intelligence, sensitivity, leadership skills, a talent for encouraging creativity in staff, and the ability to make the job at hand seem important and worthwhile come to mind. Neither men nor women have cornered the market on these attributes. There are good and bad bosses of both sexes. But I also have to admit that there can be a refreshing lack of gamesmanship when interacting with female supervisors or co-workers. The same argument is often made for the benefits of all girl’s or all boy’s schools.            

           Would I want to work in an all-female office? Hardly! But let’s face it, there can occasionally be unspoken sexual tensions between men and women in the workplace, and perceived favoritism or the opposite can sometimes rear its head. Despite workplace protocols and best B-school practices, office politics, after all, is just a microcosm of the way we interact with men and women in our personal lives. Just watch an episode of The Office, if you don’t believe it.

            As for that 28 percent who prefer working for a man: Way back in November 2003 MAKING BREAD magazine career coach JoAnn R. Hines (www.womeninpackaging.org) wrote a great piece on the subject of women competing with women in the workplace, “On the Job Etiquette: Why Can’t Women Be Nicer to Each Other?” CLICK HERE to download and read her advice for “What to Do and Say When You Run into ‘Sisterly Rivalry’ or Just Plain Rudeness at the Office.”

            Do you care whether your boss is a man or a woman? E-mail me your preference—and why you feel that way—and I’ll post your anonymous comments here.

 

Prosper & enjoy,

Gail Harlow

 

 Read More    |    Add Your Comments     |   Send to a Friend

 

Monday, July 24, 2006

War Stories

 

            Watching refugees streaming out of Beirut on the news this weekend reminded me of stories my mother used to tell us about her flight to safety when the Nazis bombed Warsaw during World War II.  Like today’s Middle East refugees, on both sides, she was forced to leave her home on a day’s notice with little more than the clothes on her back, with only one thought in her mind: saving her life.

            She was in her early 20s when the war displaced her, making her one of the millions of dispossessed in Europe at that time. The experience left her stronger. No, she never stopped loving beautiful things, like the shiny black baby grand piano she had to leave behind—but ever after, whenever hard times came her way, she knew she would be able to survive.

            It’s painful to watch the confusion and fear and pleading in the faces of innocent children, parents, and the elderly in the all-too-numerous war-wracked areas of the globe right now. What is different with today’s wars is their immediacy: in an instant, and with nightly updates, the plight of these refugees is broadcast around the world in real time, making all of us witnesses to their plight. It begs the question: if we do nothing to stop the violence, are we accomplices?

            But another lesson also emerges. Listening to sound bites from those fortunate enough to reach safety, expressing their gratitude for simply being alive, though they’ve left their material possessions behind, is a healthy reminder to those of us who have never known the mass panic that war breeds of what is truly important. Suddenly, the credit-card debt we’ve accumulated stuffing our homes with goodies seems money ill spent.

            Read more about the lessons my mother’s war stories taught me in Spending Seemed to Run in the Family, Until the Day My Father Died.”

 

Prosper & enjoy,

Gail Harlow

 

 Read More    |    Add Your Comments     |   Send to a Friend

If you like the blog, you’ll love the book.

 For more savvy finance advice, buy 

“Making Bread: The Ultimate Financial Guide for Women Who Need Dough,”

 by Gail Harlow and Elizabeth Lewin, available on Amazon.com and at your local bookstore

 

 

 

 

 

 

Send mail to webmaster@makingbreadmagazine.com  with comments about this Web site.

   copyright © 2006 MAKING BREAD Magazine | www.newhart.com

MAKING BREAD and MAKING BREAD:The Magazine for Woman Who Need Dough are trademarks of Reggai Productions LLC.

Reproduction of material from any MAKING BREAD pages
without written permission is strictly prohibited. MAKING BREAD Privacy Policy & Disclaimer.

Web Development by NCS, Inc.

Last Updated 11/07/2006 03:42